4,125 Daycare Centers in New Jersey

Parents highlight the school's flexible scheduling, diverse class options, and caring staff, with one family noting significant academic progress for their child. Conversely, a negative experience was reported regarding a strict no-refund policy for tuition paid before enrollment, causing financial frustration for a parent whose child switched to a public program.

The Learning Ladder of Lacey receives mixed reviews. Positive reviewers praise the teachers, safe learning environment, and cleanliness. However, negative reviewers cite concerns about lack of outdoor playground access, restricted parent access to the building, and issues with spot availability management.

Reviews for Millie's Angels present conflicting experiences, with one parent highlighting a safe, loving environment and supportive staff, while another alleges severe negligence, safety hazards, and unprofessional conduct following staff changes. The negative account details issues ranging from unsanitary conditions to allegations of physical mistreatment and lack of communication.

Parents highlight the program's engaging atmosphere and technology, noting features like a dedicated app and live cameras that facilitate regular photo updates. Conversely, one experience describes a lack of supervision for infants, with reports of teachers ignoring crying children and failing to intervene during unsafe climbing attempts.

Pumpkin Patch Infant Care Center receives highly polarized reviews. Three parents praise the facility's cleanliness, caring staff, and warm environment, with children showing strong attachment and development. However, two parents report serious safety and hygiene concerns, including improper formula handling, unsafe feeding practices, and alleged injury and bullying incidents.

Reviews are mixed with ratings ranging from 1-5 stars. Positive reviewers praise caring teachers, engaging curriculum, and fun learning environment. Negative reviews cite student behavior issues, administrative inefficiencies, and strict disciplinary policies.

Unable to provide summary. The reviews provided are for VA East Orange Medical Center, a Veterans Affairs hospital, not for Lil Tykes Learning Center daycare. No actual daycare reviews are available to summarize.

Little Bears Day Care II receives mostly positive feedback praising the director, staff professionalism, and quality of care. Parents highlight the welcoming environment and strong communication. However, some concerns have been raised about operational reliability and incident handling.

Parents consistently praise Learning Edge Academy for its caring, well-trained staff and educational approach. Children show enthusiasm for attending, and parents appreciate detailed daily communication, security measures, and clean facilities. Staff members are noted as passionate and genuinely invested in child development.

Kiddie Korner receives highly polarized reviews. Parents praise the facility's birthday party services, cleanliness of play areas, and staff helpfulness for events. However, multiple parents report serious concerns including staff unprofessionalism, safety issues (bruises and bite marks), poor hygiene, understaffing, unresponsiveness, and discrimination against children with special needs.

The Wonder Years Day Care Center has highly polarized reviews. Positive reviews praise the staff's care and warm atmosphere, while negative reviews raise serious concerns about owner conduct, staff behavior toward children, financial practices, and high staff turnover.

Parents highlight the school's nurturing and family-like atmosphere, noting that teachers are caring and dedicated to each child's development. Families report positive outcomes, such as children learning to read and perform math, and appreciate the welcoming environment where staff recognize them personally.

Rising Star Learning Center receives mixed reviews with stark differences in parent experiences. Positive reviewers praise staff professionalism, strong parent-teacher communication, and child learning outcomes, while negative reviewers report strict policies, lack of empathy, dismissive management, and frequent requests to pick up children. The center appears highly dependent on parental engagement and director-parent compatibility.

Ken Shirk Child Care Center receives mixed reviews with strong polarization. Positive reviewers praise the caring staff, child development, and activities, particularly highlighting the director Ms. Samantha and staff member Ms. Heidi. Negative reviewers report serious concerns about cleanliness, staff management, safety, and facility conditions.

Bright Star Day Care Center receives highly polarized reviews with stark contrasts between experiences. Positive reviews praise the caring, professional staff and nine-year track records of satisfaction, while negative reviews cite serious concerns including poor hygiene, disorganized operations, rude staff behavior, unsecured facilities, and unresponsive management.

VIDA Academy receives mixed reviews. Positive reviews praise it as clean, safe, and a place where children enjoy attending. However, negative reviews cite serious concerns including late pickups, disrespectful staff behavior, poor facility lighting, lack of management accountability, and inappropriate discipline practices.

Kids Planet Center receives extremely polarized reviews with no middle ground. Five positive reviews praise staff professionalism, care quality, and child behavior, while five negative reviews from former attendees allege physical abuse, mistreatment, and neglect of children.

Parents highlight the center's free Pre-K 3 program, noting professional and affectionate staff who provide organized learning and clear communication. However, one account details a significant failure in communication where the facility closed unexpectedly after confirming enrollment, leaving families scrambling for alternatives.

Featherbed Lane School receives mixed reviews with strong praise from most parents highlighting engaged staff, enriching curriculum, and special events, but serious concerns raised by two parents about teacher conduct, lack of communication regarding child distress, and overcrowded classroom conditions.

One parent highlights exceptional care, while others report serious safety and operational concerns including physical altercations with inadequate incident reporting, high staff turnover, rude management, and unresponsive phone lines.

One parent describes the Max Leuchter School YMCA-SACC Program as an exceptional, clean, and colorful environment where their daughter has thrived academically from Kindergarten through second grade. The review highlights the active involvement of the staff, the principal's support, and numerous community events, expressing a strong desire to keep their child in the program long-term. A second, brief mention notes positive past attendance in fourth grade with a specific teacher.

One parent describes the Woodbine Head Start Center as a dirty place. This single review highlights significant cleanliness concerns at the location.

One parent describes the center as wonderful, well-mannered, and absolutely beautiful, while another criticizes the facility for lacking safety and friendliness.

Parkside III receives consistently positive feedback from current parents who praise the caring staff, strong leadership under Director Ms. Leslie, and inclusive environment. Parents note significant improvements at the facility and recommend it highly, though they acknowledge older negative reviews exist.

One parent highlights the program as the best option, while others report serious safety and communication failures. Specific complaints include a staff member scratching a child, delayed and unhelpful incident reporting, high staff turnover without notification, rude management, and unresponsive phone lines.

One parent describes this program as the best option, while three others report serious safety and staffing failures. These negative accounts cite unexplained physical injuries, inconsistent incident reporting, and a hostile work environment characterized by high staff turnover and rude management. Additionally, parents note that the facility is often unreachable by phone, posing potential emergency risks.

Parents report a highly inconsistent experience, with one family praising the program while others cite serious safety and communication failures. Specific complaints include a staff member's rude behavior, unresponsive phone lines, and an incident involving a child's injury where the facility provided delayed and unclear explanations.

One parent describes the staff as kind, patient, and careful regarding the well-being of children and adults. Conversely, another parent reports that infants are left crying for extended periods with dismissive responses from staff who appear to ignore the babies' needs.

Gingerbread Kids Academy receives mostly positive reviews praising staff quality, cleanliness, and educational programs. However, recent reviews highlight staffing inconsistencies and isolated concerns about specific staff members and management.