868 Headstart Programs in California

VOA Grantee/Carriso Park Head Start receives mixed reviews. Some parents praise the pleasant staff and positive experience for their children, while others criticize the program for lacking academic skill-building focus and cite unprofessional communication and teaching quality concerns.

One parent describes EVANS HEAD START/STATE PRESCHOOL as not being a good school. No specific reasons for this negative assessment are provided in the available feedback.

One parent highlights the engaging curriculum and active parent involvement, while another reports severe neglect regarding hygiene and rudeness from staff. The contrasting experiences suggest significant variability in care quality and communication at this location.

One parent reports that children are left unattended in the bathroom by a single assistant teacher and describes the facility staff as inadequate and ineffective.

One parent recalls the school fondly, describing it as an amazing place built for fun and learning that evokes positive memories. In contrast, another reviewer claims the school copied Maria West, assigning it a low rating.

ECS Montgomery Head Start has polarizing reviews. Some parents report positive experiences with caring staff, bilingual education, and children enjoying school. However, multiple parents cite serious concerns including poor communication, failure to report injuries, unprofessional staff behavior, and lack of adherence to safety protocols.

Reviews are highly polarized with significant disagreement about school quality. Some parents praise supportive staff, teachers, and mental health resources, while others criticize administrative leadership, resource limitations, and teacher performance.

Reviews for this Head Start facility are predominantly negative, with parents reporting serious maintenance and pest control issues. Management and staff responsiveness have been criticized for unprofessional behavior and dismissiveness toward concerns. One positive review mentions appreciation for the tour and enrollment process.

A few parents report significant dissatisfaction with staff behavior, specifically citing rudeness from receptionists and allegations of unprofessionalism and lack of patience from educators, including one instance involving a CPS referral. Conversely, one former participant expressed personal affection for the school despite the low overall rating.

A few parents report poor service and an out-of-touch administration, with one reviewer citing a lack of parent involvement and restrictive vaccination policies for school events. The feedback highlights a desire for greater parental participation in their child's education and well-being.

One parent reports an excellent experience with great teachers and staff, while others describe a rude office environment where staff ignore visitors and direct them to apply online without assistance. A separate complaint cites a lack of running space.