5,742 Child Daycare & Preschools in New York

One reviewer reports severe maintenance issues, including sand in the faucets, preventing a senior veteran from showering or drinking water for months. The feedback also cites poor phone service and a perceived lack of personal personnel.

One parent reports that a staff member named Linday failed to return calls on numerous occasions, indicating significant communication issues. The reviewer expressed frustration after multiple failed attempts to reach out for assistance.

One parent reports a severely unsafe environment with inadequate supervision and unaddressed inappropriate behavior among children. The reviewer describes the organization as dismissive and unresponsive to safety concerns after an incident was reported.

One parent reports a severe medical incident involving their anemic three-year-old, alleging that staff incorrectly administered Narcan instead of an epinephrine injection after the child passed out from a prolonged nosebleed. The review also details a dispute where the center filed three false reports of physical abuse against the father, citing a pre-existing minor mark from roughhousing as evidence of assault.

One parent describes the experience as bad, resulting in a low overall rating for the center.

One parent reports that the center cancelled care via voicemail without notifying both working parents, leaving children unaware of the change. The reviewer also cites insufficient supervision, inconsistent disciplinary practices, and potential issues with record-keeping for families with joint custody.

One parent describes the facility as having dirty houses, poor employee selection, and bad treatment of both staff and individuals.

One parent reports that staff were young and inexperienced, allowing their two-year-old to cry for hours without comfort and instructing the child to stop crying.

One parent describes Treehouse Development Ctr. Corp. as prioritizing financial gain over child care, specifically citing rude and unprofessional behavior from a staff member named Miss Shay. The reviewer explicitly advises against enrollment, citing a lack of care for children and inappropriate staff conduct.

One parent reports significant communication issues at the center. The single review available indicates dissatisfaction with how the facility handles correspondence.

One parent describes the center as unsafe, alleging that staff allow children to eat rocks and involve CPS and OCFS repeatedly, while another criticizes a tour experience involving a hostile staff member who prioritizes profit over facility quality.

One parent reports that the center is permanently closed following a child drowning incident in a pool, citing staff negligence and lack of supervision. The reviewer also alleges the facility operated without a license, had over 60 violations, and faced a lawsuit from the child's mother.

One parent reports that staff members appeared inexperienced and failed to provide adequate emotional support, specifically allowing a two-year-old child to cry for extended periods without comfort or intervention.

One parent reports a negative interaction with staff, describing a phone representative as rude without cause. This single complaint highlights concerns about communication and customer service. No positive aspects were mentioned in the available feedback.

One parent reports that the center suffers from poor communication, frequent staff shortages, and a tendency to close unexpectedly, while expressing strong regret over the enrollment decision. The only positive noted was having a good teacher for a partial school year.

One parent reports a highly unsatisfactory enrollment experience, describing the staff as unsupportive, unfriendly, and curt. They note that the center does not guarantee admission and appears to deliberately complicate paperwork, creating unnecessary barriers and an unwelcoming atmosphere for families.

One parent describes a deeply unsatisfying enrollment experience, citing staff who were perceived as unsupportive, unfriendly, and curt. The reviewer highlights that the center does not guarantee admission and deliberately complicates paperwork, creating unnecessary barriers to entry. Consequently, the facility is described as unwelcoming and is not recommended as a childcare backup option.

A single review describes the center as a long-standing institution that has remained memorable since the writer attended as a four-year-old in 1984. The feedback highlights the center's historical presence and lasting impression on former attendees.

One parent describes the summer program as severely disorganized and poorly managed, citing non-functional communication lines and unhelpful staff. The reviewer also reports incidents involving lost children, incorrect administrative details, inadequate support for children with disabilities, and inappropriate language used by staff.

One parent describes the facility as having dirty houses and poor employee selection, while also citing bad treatment of staff and individuals. This single review highlights significant concerns regarding cleanliness and interpersonal dynamics within the center.

One parent reports that the summer camp lacked air conditioning in the primary activity room, forcing children outside during extreme heat and into a windowless, kitchen-adjacent space upon return. The reviewer also cited poor communication and responsiveness from the directors.

One parent describes the center as a 'preschool fraud,' citing a severe safety incident where a teacher mistakenly handed another child to the parent's nanny and locked the door, leaving the child in the wrong person's custody. The reviewer expresses extreme concern regarding the lack of security protocols and the potential physical and mental harm to children.