10,151 Child Daycare & Preschools in California

Parents praise the local teachers, director Yanci, and Spanish immersion curriculum at KSS Albany, reporting children become fluent in Spanish in a nurturing environment. However, all recent reviews are highly critical of corporate administration following a private equity acquisition, citing a sudden 50%+ tuition increase announced 3 days before re-enrollment with no local benefits, new installment fees, high teacher turnover, and alleged attempts to restrict parent speech through contract language.

One parent alleges that a staff member named Amy physically abused their children by grabbing and shoving them, resulting in injuries such as a nose scar. The reviewer claims the center failed to address these incidents, instead moving the teacher to a different location to avoid parental visibility.

One parent describes severe physical abuse by a staff member named Amy, including grabbing, shoving, and tripping their son, resulting in a facial scar. The reviewer alleges management failed to address these incidents, instead moving the staff member to a different location and ignoring complaints from multiple families.

One parent describes severe allegations of physical abuse by a staff member named Amy, including grabbing, shoving, and tripping their child, resulting in visible injuries. The reviewer claims the center failed to address these incidents, instead transferring the staff member to another location while ignoring complaints from the family.

One parent describes severe allegations of physical abuse and negligence by a staff member named Amy, including grabbing, shoving, and tripping their child. The reviewer claims the center failed to address these incidents, relocated the staff member instead of terminating her, and provided inadequate supervision that caused significant distress to the children involved.

Parent reviews are sharply divided. Positive reviews praise safe campuses, patient educators, and strong support systems. Negative reviews heavily criticize district administration, citing poor facilities, low teacher compensation, lack of transparency, and concerns about mismanagement of resources.

One parent describes severe allegations of physical abuse and negligence by a staff member named Amy, including grabbing, shoving, and causing injury to their children, while claiming management failed to address these incidents appropriately. Another reviewer corroborates claims of poor treatment by the same employee and expresses deep disappointment with the center's handling of safety concerns and staff accountability. A third review expresses lasting anger over the treatment of their children without providing additional specific details.

Parkside Preschool is a play-based center in Newark offering flexible scheduling and cultural programming. However, the facility is under investigation by county licensing and police following the death of a child in October due to improperly installed and unsafe playground equipment. The director allegedly misrepresented safety inspections and knowingly allowed unsupervised use of equipment despite awareness that padding was needed.

One parent describes a positive experience with the program's routine and staff, while other reviewers express dissatisfaction with camp quality and specific facility policies. A separate account details a distressing enrollment dispute involving administrative errors and perceived discrimination. One reviewer also criticizes the camp's focus and a policy banning skateboarding.

One parent reports that the center does not provide sufficient attention or instruction, while another describes the staff as relaxed.

One parent describes a negative experience involving alleged staff dishonesty, mental abuse, and the owner screaming in front of children. The reviewer reports that their child was negatively influenced and states the center is not trustworthy.

One parent reports serious concerns regarding unprofessional conduct, including unsolicited medical diagnoses and failure to report or treat a child's injury. The reviewer also describes a dispute with the owner over disciplinary expectations and communication transparency.

One parent reports a terrible experience involving their autistic daughter, alleging the school refused to accommodate her needs and repeatedly called child services. The reviewer claims staff made these calls without reason due to scheduling conflicts and a refusal to sign an IEP. One staff member was noted as nice, but the overall interaction was described as highly negative.

One parent reports a highly unprofessional and disorganized experience during a scheduled tour, citing poor communication and staff behavior as major safety and trust concerns. The reviewer describes being dismissed by management while staff were distracted, leading to a complete loss of confidence in the center's ability to care for their child.

One parent warns against bringing children here, citing serious safety concerns and stating that the director speaks negatively about both the children and parents behind their backs.

One parent describes being removed from the program at age three due to a disagreement over cleanup responsibilities, alleging the decision was motivated by racial bias. The reviewer states they remain well-behaved for their age and advises against enrolling children at this center based on this negative experience.

One parent describes a negative experience involving a staff member named Mr. Zach who allegedly refused to allow a child to use a Chromebook for homework and required the child to clean up spilled chips. The reviewer characterizes the facility as horrible and strongly advises against enrollment.

One parent reports that their child disliked the program due to staff who appeared miserable and were observed yelling at children. The reviewer states they no longer bring their family to the center based on these experiences.

One parent reports a negative experience involving judgmental attitudes toward their daughter at the center.

One parent reports removing their child due to safety concerns regarding the program director, describing her as manipulative and toxic. While the teaching staff is acknowledged as great, the leadership's behavior is cited as the primary reason for leaving the center.

One parent describes being dismissed from the center at age three for alleged failure to clean up, despite claiming to have been well-behaved. The reviewer attributes this decision to potential racial discrimination and advises against enrollment based on this negative experience.

One parent reports a negative experience from decades ago, alleging they were expelled at age three for cleaning issues and claiming the decision was racially motivated.

One parent recounts a negative experience from decades ago, alleging they were unfairly expelled for cleaning issues and suggesting racial bias motivated the decision. The reviewer advises against using the center based on this childhood memory.

One parent recounts a negative experience from when they were three years old, alleging they were expelled for cleaning up after themselves and suggesting the decision was racially motivated. The reviewer advises other parents against using this center due to the perceived unfair treatment and bias.

One parent reports being expelled from the center at age three for alleged failure to clean up, characterizing the action as unfair and potentially racially motivated. The reviewer warns other parents that staff may blame children for their behavior.

One parent recounts being removed from the center at age three, alleging the staff unfairly blamed them for cleaning issues and acted with racial bias. The reviewer states they remain well-behaved and strongly advises against enrolling children there due to this negative experience.