285 Headstart Programs in Tennessee

Parents consistently praise Clinton Early Head Start and Pre-K for providing excellent care and learning opportunities for children ages 6 weeks to 5 years. The facility is highlighted for strong security protocols during pickup, attentive staff, and visible developmental progress. Parents express high satisfaction with the program overall.

One parent describes the program with high enthusiasm, stating they love it. The single review provided is entirely positive with no complaints listed.

Parents consistently praise Shiloh Head Start for its caring and engaged teaching staff who genuinely enjoy working with children. The facility is described as providing a positive learning environment where children are happy to attend daily. All reviews are highly positive with no significant concerns raised.

Mid Cumberland Head Start #2 - Shalom is highly praised by parents and community members for its comprehensive Head Start program and extensive community support services. Parents consistently highlight caring, loving teachers, strong safety measures, and effective teaching methods that keep children excited about attending. Beyond childcare, the facility offers valuable resources including food and hygiene pantries, after-school tutoring, summer programs, and parenting classes.

One parent describes the staff as very nice, while another expresses appreciation for the teachers. The few reviews so far highlight positive interactions with the childcare team.

Florida Avenue Head Start in Bristol receives mostly positive feedback, with parents praising the sweet teachers, helpful resources, and quality care. However, one parent reported serious communication issues, citing inability to reach staff by phone and lack of returned calls.

One parent describes the staff as super sweet and nice, specifically noting their positive interaction with babies. No negative feedback has been provided in the available reviews.

One parent describes the center with high affection, while another offers a lukewarm assessment based on a relative's opinion. The limited feedback presents conflicting views on the quality of care.

Brookside Head Start receives consistently high praise from parents who report significant developmental progress in their children. Parents highlight the caring, knowledgeable staff who go above and beyond, with many noting lasting relationships formed through the program.

One parent highlights the great staff at Daisy Head Start Center but notes that the parking lot requires improvement.

One parent highlights the staff's dedication, noting they are a great group who do a lot to educate and care for the children. The review reflects a positive experience with the program's educational and caregiving efforts.

One parent highlights the professional and kind nature of the staff, describing it as a great place for their child. Conversely, another parent reports a serious incident involving physical abuse by a teacher and alleges the administration failed to investigate or address the complaint.

One parent rates the RIDGEWOOD HEAD START CENTER 4 out of 5 stars, specifically noting that the facility is clean. No other feedback is available to evaluate beyond this single comment.

One parent asks about transportation options, specifically inquiring if buses are available for students. No other feedback has been provided yet.

One parent expresses satisfaction with the teaching staff, while another reports significant issues with communication and staff competence. The latter reviewer notes that faculty members allegedly lie about contacting parents and appear overwhelmed, leading to financial costs and a decision to withdraw their child.

One parent reports a negative experience involving yelling teachers, a lack of academic instruction, and maintenance issues such as a run-down building and unclean classrooms. While the playground and routine desk cleaning are noted as positives, the reviewer criticizes the facility for allowing outdoor play in cold weather and lacking professional oversight.

One parent highlights enjoyment of the teachers, while another reports significant communication issues regarding staff calls and suggests the teacher is overwhelmed. A third review mentions a casual social atmosphere but does not address childcare quality.

Susan Gray Head Start in Nashville receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from parents. Children show enthusiasm for attending school and demonstrate strong academic and social development. Staff are consistently praised as welcoming, dedicated, and caring.

One parent describes this Head Start program as having wonderful, caring staff and excellent facilities, while another raises serious safety concerns regarding physical handling of children by teachers.

Based on available reviews, Bodenham Head Start Center receives mixed feedback. Most reviewers praise the friendly and helpful staff, though some note operational issues with facility accessibility, signage, and equipment limitations.

One parent highlights exceptional academic outcomes, noting their child developed advanced literacy and cognitive skills. Another family reported significant learning during their child's Head Start program. However, a separate complaint describes systemic neglect of staff welfare and serious safety violations regarding unauthorized child pickup.

Short Mountain/Mid Cumberland Preschool receives mostly positive feedback from parents whose children attend, with praise for friendly staff and quality care. However, one parent expressed frustration with poor communication regarding application status, noting delays in receiving decisions.

One parent highlights exceptional academic outcomes, noting their child developed advanced literacy skills and critical thinking abilities. Another review praises the program's effectiveness for a grandchild who completed the Head Start curriculum successfully.

Ashland City Head Start receives mostly positive feedback from parents whose children currently attend. Parents praise the caring staff and positive experiences, though one applicant expressed frustration with delayed communication regarding application status.

One parent describes the program as awesome with amazing teachers, while another reports being turned away on their daughter's first day of second year attendance due to a missed open house. The second reviewer notes the open house was not marked as mandatory on the invitation letter and suggests the situation was handled poorly.